tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3274583756441452923.post7273064432625770781..comments2024-02-13T14:28:21.282-05:00Comments on New Jovian Thunderbolt: Williams and WoolardNew Jovian Thunderbolthttp://www.blogger.com/profile/09452246769246304612noreply@blogger.comBlogger3125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3274583756441452923.post-50382487347658821852011-07-26T12:23:39.980-04:002011-07-26T12:23:39.980-04:00What other constitutional rights are null & vo...What other constitutional rights are null & void depending upon population density?....Mike W.https://www.blogger.com/profile/03425962910696301026noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3274583756441452923.post-85228699503495587652011-07-25T07:57:01.309-04:002011-07-25T07:57:01.309-04:00This really comes down to another case in the 4th ...This really comes down to another case in the 4th circuit, Masciandaro.<br /><br />Regardless of whether or not the judge in this case agrees, Masciandaro stands as 4th circuit precedent. Also, the queston being asked of the district court has nothing to do with location, population density, the color of the sky, etc, so this is all hypothetical which Judge Legg said during the hearing. Location, population density, etc are all things that will have to be argued in a separate case.<br /><br />I'll quote from the note taker, Judge Legg must:<br />"rule on the constitutionality of the "Good and Substantial" requirement - not anything else."<br /><br />Legal battles are on small, focused piece at a time. Have patience. We didn't get all these silly laws on the books in one day, we aren't going to dismantle them in a single case.Frozennoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3274583756441452923.post-62982793450020002922011-07-24T09:20:40.762-04:002011-07-24T09:20:40.762-04:00So they are trying to base their attack against th...So they are trying to base their attack against the RKBA based on the number of Sheeple present during any given moment? Hmmm. So under their line of reasoning, let's just say (hypothetically, of course), that you have a small island full of kids attending Camp, but because there's a lot of them, a CCW Holder would be banned from carrying there because there's a lot of kids? So if a Neo-Nazi Nut Job decided that, because they might grow up to be Good Socialists, he could show up and start Massacring them, all while delaying the Police with a car bomb in the nearby Capital. And no Citizen with a J-Frame could end the Madness. Not that such a thing could EVER happen, of course.<br /><br /> Texas Tower, Columbine, Va. Tech, Ft. Hood, Tucson, Oslo, what's the thing they ALL had in common? Lots of People to shoot. <br /><br />Here's the real issue. It goes back to Big Tim Sullivan and the law he got passed a hundred years ago in NYC. No Guns Allowed, because you might just shoot the Corrupt Politician and his Thugs and Cronies, and the Ruling Scum can't have that threat around them when they come out to Promise their "Pie in the Sky" to the Masses so they can get Re-Elected. <br /><br />But let them place that Argument before SCOTUS. It should fly like a Lead Balloon.Bubblehead Les.https://www.blogger.com/profile/00730873284089958084noreply@blogger.com