Why we have platform arguments
We inherit them, partly. The inertia from the old timers.
Mostly it is self justification. We selected our firearm carefully, with much research and consideration. Weighed in our mind which feature we valued most and prioritized the others. Once all the compromises are made and we have our choice we have now chosen what is ideal for us.
Now we expand that, to after the purchase. We are challenged, or perceive to be challenged, on our choice, and we get defensive. We are invested in our choice. And then we rant. Generally humourously, intentionally or not. Often tediously.
Of course, in the back of our minds, subcounsiously maybe, we KNOW that our argument is, "This blurfl is the best designed more perfect firearm. FOR ME." Forgetting the 'for me' part is where the platform jihads on the internet start. But it IS true. You blurfl is perfect. Perfect for you. If it isn't you usually know what gun you are looking to get to have the best hog leg for you. And it's a wonderful thing. So these platform arguments ain't no thang. But that's the reason for them.
That and the fact Glock owners are clinically INSANE.
ttthhhhhhbbbbpppppptt!!!
ReplyDelete(that's from my G30)
"Glock owner not insane," states Jay 'KuhRAZY-Man' G...
ReplyDeleteSorta helping me make that argument.
My Glock just told me to tell you I'm not insane. If you need confirmation you can ask it yourself.
ReplyDeleteAs a glock owner, I agree with the last sentence of this post.
ReplyDelete(VeriWord: Plate. Mmmm - a table dressing AND a target :)