Michael Williamson explained this. I reiterate by quoting him:
"The first time an authorized shooter, cop or citizen, pulls the trigger, nothing happens, and the bad guy's gun works, they or their family will sue. I need it to FAIL TO THE UNLOCK STATE.
The first time an unauthorized shooter is able to access it, the victims will sue. The mfr needs it to FAIL TO THE LOCK STATE. It cannot do both."Fail in unlock state, fail in lock state. Mutually exclusive requirements by two opposing interests. Pay attention. Smart guns are baloney. They can't be perfect. Even if they could be perfect there are plenty of OTHER arguments against them that I don't even have to go
This kid is either wasting time chasing a unicorn or he is scamming. Either way he should quit. Gloves don't matter, battery life is irrelevant.
Leave out the fact his device will be used to restrict people's civil rights... It's hen's teeth. Stop searching for teeth in your chickens
No comments:
Post a Comment
I reserve the right to delete patently offensive comments. Or, really, any comment I feel like. Or I might leave a really juicy comment up for private ridicule. Also spammers.
You can always offend hippies in the comment section. Chances are, those will be held up as a proper example...