If you read the history of the origins of the design, you'll get annoyed. Typical bureaucratic meddling. Oversized, overweight, and therefor under-powered.
That fancy landing gear? It could handle rough surfaces that the pilot couldn't deal with. And it wasn't used off field in 'Nam. Always from a base, so that very heavy system was worthless. They weren't allowed to change it.
That zero-zero ejection seat? Very heavy, and I'm not sure it got used. IIRC, each seat was about 700 lbs, x2.
Ditching was contraindicated. 100% fatality rate.
More than a few were lost when they couldn't out-climb the slopes of the hills, and performed the classic "controlled flight into terrain".
The Marines armed their aircraft, the Air Force didn't. Birddog only, just marking rockets. Stupid politics.
I reserve the right to delete patently offensive comments. Or, really, any comment I feel like. Or I might leave a really juicy comment up for private ridicule. Also spammers.
You can always offend hippies in the comment section. Chances are, those will be held up as a proper example...
If you read the history of the origins of the design, you'll get annoyed. Typical bureaucratic meddling. Oversized, overweight, and therefor under-powered.
ReplyDeleteThat fancy landing gear? It could handle rough surfaces that the pilot couldn't deal with. And it wasn't used off field in 'Nam. Always from a base, so that very heavy system was worthless. They weren't allowed to change it.
That zero-zero ejection seat? Very heavy, and I'm not sure it got used. IIRC, each seat was about 700 lbs, x2.
Ditching was contraindicated. 100% fatality rate.
More than a few were lost when they couldn't out-climb the slopes of the hills, and performed the classic "controlled flight into terrain".
The Marines armed their aircraft, the Air Force didn't. Birddog only, just marking rockets. Stupid politics.