Radial engines could be much tougher than a jet. It wasn't all that uncommon for WW2 aircraft to return to base with cylinders missing from running engines. That was one of the big draws for those aircooled engines. Robust and reliable. Bulky was their main drawback.
Look up the book "Thunderbolt" by Robert S. Johnson. He details a flight in which several German fighters expended whatever ammunition they had, and left, disappointed that his P-47 kept running and flying. The airplane was flying scrap, but the radial engine kept running, enough.
I reserve the right to delete patently offensive comments. Or, really, any comment I feel like. Or I might leave a really juicy comment up for private ridicule. Also spammers.
You can always offend hippies in the comment section. Chances are, those will be held up as a proper example...
Radial engines could be much tougher than a jet. It wasn't all that uncommon for WW2 aircraft to return to base with cylinders missing from running engines. That was one of the big draws for those aircooled engines. Robust and reliable. Bulky was their main drawback.
ReplyDeleteLook up the book "Thunderbolt" by Robert S. Johnson. He details a flight in which several German fighters expended whatever ammunition they had, and left, disappointed that his P-47 kept running and flying. The airplane was flying scrap, but the radial engine kept running, enough.
ReplyDelete