There is a bone of Contention amongst those who study the Constitution, and that would be the 9th and 10th Amendments. Some (the Hippie /Commie/Progressive Crowd) say that means "just because it ain't written down, doesn't mean I don't have the Right to (fill in the blank) whenever I feel like it, and you can't stop me!" Others ( the Conservitive, Practical, Grounded in Reality Crowd) say that they Founders never meant to imply that Anarchy can Reign Supreme, as there are limits.
But no matter what side you are, there are Rights that are written down, and the Commies better get get used to the Fact that they have no right to try to remove them, such as the RKBA. Or THEY should start to face the Consequences of their actions. If the Chaos in the Middle East should teach ANYONE in Power in the West, is that they are just as vulnerable to removal as any Middle Eastern Thug Dictator, no matter how long they've been in Charge.
To be confident and competent enough with a rifle to be able to hit anything I can see in a Jovian Thunderbolt kind of way.
To be able to defend myself with a handgun.
To perhaps harvest some tasty venison with either a rifle or a shotgun, any skin or antler is just a nice bonus, here.
And, if necessary: To Defend the Ramparts of Democracy from a Level 4 Zombie Outbreak or against the Jacobin, Rampaging, Godless, Red-Commie Hordes (or their modern equivalent.)
"You never select a shotgun as your primary anti-zombie firearm. It's great for onesy twosey, but zombies travel in hordes. The reload time is onerous, and the ammo, while effective, is heavy and bulky and short ranged."
Big Mistake for Her
If Ginsberg had let Scalia put the words "strict scrutiny" in Heller and Hillary said "Gun control is just not going to be a priority for my administration," Hillary would have been elected President.
People I Hit F5 on all day, hoping for more content...
Warning!
-
Tam keeps chuckling when she puts something in the kitchen wastebasket.
A few days ago, me and my bad back managed to fumble our way to
breaking ...
2nd Amendment Rate of Progress
-
Quote of the Day In America, we do not need anyone’s permission to say what
we think, to live as we please, to worship as we choose, or to keep and
bear ar...
What an Escaped Mental Patient Taught Me
-
My first encounters with lunacy began long before I became a cop. The
year was 1989. I was a high school junior who worked part time at a nearby
K-Mart ...
The Cutts Compensator Is Back, Sort Of
-
The intention behind the original Cutts Compensator was to reduce your
gun’s muzzle climb as well as its recoil. The idea was that the ports cut
into the c...
Rock Hill SC Assassination Attempt
-
You don’t have to be President Trump to be ‘Targeted for Termination.’ Bad
Decisions lead to Negative Outcomes; one Justifiable Killing and one 10
year pri...
The New Resistance to the 2A
-
You can see the resistance is shaping up around “sensitive places” doctrine
and “good moral character.” I remember seeing a comment from Prof. Adam
Winkler...
Light blogging
-
Minor medical condition taken care of. Nothing to worry about. But requires
a lot of couch time. Back later. Kamagra Ohne Rezept Kaufen
Eighteen Years Ago Today...
-
Eighteen years ago today, my son was born. TheBoy entered the collective
conscious, bringing "father" to the list of names I proudly wear. He's off
to the ...
We the people of the United States, in order to form a more perfect union, establish justice, insure domestic tranquility, provide for the common defense, promote the general welfare, and secure the blessings of liberty to ourselves and our posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America.
2 comments:
Um... not so much... A desire maybe, but not a right...
There is a bone of Contention amongst those who study the Constitution, and that would be the 9th and 10th Amendments. Some (the Hippie /Commie/Progressive Crowd) say that means "just because it ain't written down, doesn't mean I don't have the Right to (fill in the blank) whenever I feel like it, and you can't stop me!" Others ( the Conservitive, Practical, Grounded in Reality Crowd) say that they Founders never meant to imply that Anarchy can Reign Supreme, as there are limits.
But no matter what side you are, there are Rights that are written down, and the Commies better get get used to the Fact that they have no right to try to remove them, such as the RKBA. Or THEY should start to face the Consequences of their actions. If the Chaos in the Middle East should teach ANYONE in Power in the West, is that they are just as vulnerable to removal as any Middle Eastern Thug Dictator, no matter how long they've been in Charge.
Post a Comment