Schadenfreude

Governor O'Malley signed the newest Gun Ban this week.  Here is an article about "he might be smiling now, but..."

Beretta, of course, is disappointed and is seriously looking to move to a more friendly state.  Beretta did lobby on the people's behalf against these tyrants, but there is only so much they can do.   “The law that finally passed went from being atrocious to simply being bad”

So O'Malley has that going against him.

The suspected philanderer O'Malley has more than that to worry about.  Wait until the mood of the country comes out in 2014.  He wants to be president so bad he can taste it.  And the mood of the country against gun banners will make swimming against that torrent look like gentle babbling brook that we saw in the 90s backlash against anti-civil rights pols.

And I am going to enjoy his comeuppance.  The last Marylander elected to a high spot in an administration was Spiro Agnew...  

Let's make gun control today look like supporting Jim Crow segregation after 1965.   It's a civil right, more important the gay marriage, more important that Roe v Wade.  A civil right to defend your personal self with the best means available.

19,000

The Connecticut governor seems to think that is guns disappeared then 19,000 people would be saved from committing suicide.

Really?  He doesn't think some subset of that 19,000 might find alternate means?  And didn't the nearby state of Vermont just pass a law saying that suicide is sorta the business of the suicidee and not the business of the State?  Whatcha bet it won't be long before Connecticut passes a similar measure.

Governor, when you argue and persuade, it'd be nice if you made more rational sense.

Rule #2

Rule #2 is essentially "Don't muzzle anything precious with your gun"

But when you put a gun in a holster is magically becomes something else.  It can be pointed at anything.  Rule #2 no longer applies.

Normally this is fine.  It actually is something else.  It is a holstered gun.  Assuming you have a good holster, it's triggerguard is completely protected and with a modern firearm in good condition it cannot go off once it is in the holster. 

People get cavalier with the holstered gatt.  I was thinking... should we?

AR range report

I took my AR to the range, finally.  The purpose?  Function check it, as I assembled the lower myself and modded the upper a bit, and to sight it in.

First of all, I took it to Clark Brothers.  You have to buy their ammo, generally, to shoot at their free range.  So I didn't bring my own (or much of my own)  They had .41 colt, but no .38 or .45 ACP.  They were out of .22.  They had over a dozen boxes of 5.56 .  Cool!  I'll get 4.  Nope, restricted to one per customer, but they were forgiving of using your own ammo from home.  Dang!

Well, the first thing I found out is that I should have marked the gas block better.  I musta lined it up poorly.  The AR is a single shot (Maryland, if they knew, would be ecstatic...)  The gases in my gas operated rifle are not operating.  Well, shucks.  I don't even know how to adjust that to be sure I am doing it right.  Any help?

The EOTech was shooting low and right at 25 yards.  I figure zeroed at 25 means zeroed at 250, and shooting high at 100.  It took MAJOR adjustment to get that sight dialed in.  Full turns of the dials adjusted with a tool made for the job.  A Jefferson nickel.  I got that done, one shot at a time.  a few rounds out at 100 to confirm I am way high out there, but still pretty centerline, vertically.  Good.  So, solve my problem with the gas cycle and I have a carbine that works as advertised.  No other flaws noticed.

Luckily, I had some .38 and some loaded .45 mags.  I thought my new snubbie had a better trigger than my current snubbie, but now I can't tell the difference.  Good.  I want them to be twins.

The new 70s era Colt Commander surprised me.  It shot VERY well.  I am very happy with that. 

Rationality

For decades the pro-civil rights community has been honing their arguments, and getting good at it as there are some really smart people doing in backed up by interested, principled, regular people that absorb the lessons.  We win at it, quite simply.  It has gotten to the point that anti-gun people resort to what is termed 'reasoned discourse' when they try to grasp at counter points.  They shut down debate on online forums, delete comments, take their ball and go home.

Yay.

But losing the argument doesn't stop them.  Mostly, their side is all emotions.  And irrefutable truth doesn't make a dent on their emotions.  "Stop with your facts, it will not change how I feel." If we can put a dent into shutting THAT down, we will truly win.

How?  How do we counter their fear based emotional policy position?

The other side is thinking the same thing, and fortunately they are more clueless as to their root problem. 

My personal preference is for the NRA to push through a universal background check bill.  A reform of the 1968 GCA.  Get rid of the interstate sale prohibitions, get rid of form 4473 as NICS obviates the need for that 45 year old system, and dump the serial number tracking on private sales.  But require the buyer (and maybe the seller) to be NICS checked.  "MBtGE from VA is selling to TBolt in MD one rifle (pistol, shotgun, other).  Both pass NICS so the sale can proceed.  This check is valid for the remainder of the month (quarter)."  A valid CCW license would suffice for the check.   Done.  Plenty of oppurtunity for ATF to run sting ops and arrest illegal sellers or buyers.  Mandate a reasonable NICS fee.

"So, that rational solution doesn't fight the irrational anti's, TBolt" you say.  No, but it takes that tactic out of their quiver.  And it's reasonable.  Just a thought.  Pass a pro-gun bill and call it gun control the whole time.

Then we work on the other sides' emotions in some way I haven't figured out.

Parks and Rec

Some people told me that Parks and Recreation was the best thing on TV right now.  It is not.

Unless I misheard them and they said something else besides 'best'.

That is all.

Espanol

Why didn't anyone tell me of the existence of this thing?

You all know about my obscession -- and also hesitation to do anything about -- pistol caliber carbines!

What's spanish for "does it come with a left handed bolt?"

Minutes Away

The police aren't obligated to protect you, according to long court precedent.

And that is obvious in Trenton NJ with long response times to 911 'intruder inside the house!' calls.  Trenton is trying hard to become the next Detroit.  The difference is the much more liberalized firearm laws Michigan compared to New Jersey.  People in Detroit arm themselves legally for their own self-defense.

That would be a novel court challenge.  Some are calling for suing business owners for not taking responsibity for you after posting their property a Gun-Free zone, it would also be an idea to challenge the precedent for police not protecting individual in dire need since state laws makes taking measures for your own personal safety problematic. 

If you are disarmed by the state the state should take up the burden of defending you and should be sued for failing to effectively.

Sticky legal wicket, but a thought. 

Confiscate

Remember this when they claim they aren't talking about confiscating your Constitutional protected property.

“We needed a bill that was going to confiscate, confiscate, confiscate.”
“They [gun owners] want to keep the guns out of the hands of the bad guys, but they don’t have any regulations to do it.”
“They don’t care about the bad guys.  All they want to do is have their little guns and do whatever they want with them.”

Krep onna Crackah!

Price per round of 9mm versus 7.62x51 is approaching parity.  Holeee...  They both seem to be about a buck a round.

"You should get an M&P 9, T-Bolt.  All the cool kids are, and the ammo is so much cheaper to practice with."

Dodged a proverbial bullet, there.

Now I am regretting buying .22 firearms in the past.

Fantastic

Chuck Shumer describes the Defense Distributed 3D printed gun as a "stomach churning" development.  He is soiling his britches because it may be undetectable. 

Well, that isn't the point of the thing.  The point of the thing is that we won't be disarmed and the latest technology makes it harder for Chuck to get his right-violating way.

If 3D printers used some sort of sintered powder or plastic/ceramic matrice that then burned away in a kiln leaving a steel 'printing' behind, and the cost of such a printer and makeshift kiln was comparable to the kind that use ABS plastic, and especially if the result was a superior metal pistol/receiver frame, then I'd be prepared to bet that Defense Distributed would have preferred to go that route. 

Give it time, I'm sure such a thing will come along.

Another alternative was a comparably priced home turnkey CNC machine that could carve out an AR lower from a billet.  The prices on those come down all the time, too.

Do you think Shumer would have a problem with a $4000 CNC machine that could make a lower or 1911 frame?  You bet he would.  He be just as stomach churned.  Good. 

Oh no, rain again...

I can't afford this.

Finally

I got a range day scheduled for this coming weekend.  Finally test out the new AR.  I feel much shame in not getting to the range more.  Archie has been taking up a lot of my time.

Shoot Outs

There are plenty of videos out there but the latest one was seen on Uncle.  It was removed, but you may have seen it.  Try this link.

There are vids others out there.

This is one of the things about dash cams on cop cars.  You can see and analyze a shootout and look for applications for CCW emergencies.

Now, the cop/bad-guy dynamic isn't going to be there.  It will be predator-chooses-unoptimal-victim from the predators point of view.  But bear with me.

What is usually in common with all these videos?

Biggest thing is the adrenalin dump all around.  Lots of emotion.  Lots of loss of fine motor skills.  Tunnel vision.  Lots of shots.  And lots of misses.  Imminent death can draw your full attention.

What did you expect shootout to be like you see out of Hollywood?

The other thing is...  movement.  A shooter (cop or badguy) might freeze in place if they are behind cover, but if not they tend to shift around like a boxer.  Instinctively, as I am assuming the bad guys don't take pistol classes that tell them to get off the X.

Remember the side steps the bad guy takes in the Uncle video, if you caught it?  Sadly, against right handed shooters, this is the 'wrong' way.  Tactical error on the bad guy.  He wants to move the other way because right handers will shoot low and left.  But in a car stop, he really can't side step to his left.  The car blocks him.  Moving is better than not moving, certainly.  And for all we know both cops were lefties.

We don't know all the details for this particular shooting.  The female cop was injured, the bad guy got dead, if I had to guess.  Specific details...  The bad guy had a gun in his hand the whole time, from exit of his vehicle to after he was no longer moving.  The bad guy has a rifle.  Looks like it may be an AK type with no shoulder stock or none unfolded (good for the cops, as he wasn't aiming).  30 seconds.  From the first shot to the last.  Not a lot of time.  Bad guys seems unhinged, and may have shouted "kill me!"  No way to tell. 

With all that missing going on, and the amped up bad guy and cops, LOTS of rounds were fired and lots were needed it seems.  Tends to happen with pistols.  Again, unlike Hollywood, the bad guys don't crumple up every time after one hit.  So, what if you have a 5 shot snubbie?  Well you can't go into a shootout with the same mindset/tactics, clearly.  Shoot and get the flock out of there.  Forcing yourself to not panic would be useful, and not empty your 5 shots, but who can ensure that going in?  Still probably a good idea to try that.  Lots of movement and movement to cover when your 5 shot .38 is going against 15 9mm or, in this case, maybe 30 7.62mm. 

Let's see if this stays...

Gun Debate

To have a rational conversation about gun the anti-gunners have to accept a condition before the discussion starts.  Anti-gunners are the bad guys trying to restrict an individual right.  Just as if they were insisting that police no longer need probable cause or that they wanted to institute a $200 tax in order to vote or wanted to return to segregation by race.

Concede that point from the start, then we can talk.

"the reason we can’t have a rational gun debate is because the anti-gun side pre-supposes that their pro-gun opponents must first accept that guns are bad in order to have a discussion about guns in the first place. Before we even start the conversation, we’re the bad guys and we have to admit it. Without accepting that guns are bad and supplicating themselves to the anti-gunner, the pro-gunner can’t get a word in edgewise, and is quickly reduced to being called a murderer, or a low, immoral and horrible human being."

We are not, generally, horrible human beings.  But the anti-gun side has insisted we are for decades.  I might accept they are not the bad guys, and are debating from a position of good faith, but only after they sit in the corner on it for a few decades, starting now.   When their arguments are absent eliminationistic rhetoric for a score or more years 

(golly that's a good essay.  RTWT.)