The whole thing must be done with computer generated graphics, and I found that impressive, and amazingly realistic. I would watch it again, so sure, rent it and see for yourself.
To be confident and competent enough with a rifle to be able to hit anything I can see in a Jovian Thunderbolt kind of way.
To be able to defend myself with a handgun.
To perhaps harvest some tasty venison with either a rifle or a shotgun, any skin or antler is just a nice bonus, here.
And, if necessary: To Defend the Ramparts of Democracy from a Level 4 Zombie Outbreak or against the Jacobin, Rampaging, Godless, Red-Commie Hordes (or their modern equivalent.)
"You never select a shotgun as your primary anti-zombie firearm. It's great for onesy twosey, but zombies travel in hordes. The reload time is onerous, and the ammo, while effective, is heavy and bulky and short ranged."
Big Mistake for Her
If Ginsberg had let Scalia put the words "strict scrutiny" in Heller and Hillary said "Gun control is just not going to be a priority for my administration," Hillary would have been elected President.
People I Hit F5 on all day, hoping for more content...
Zastava’s First Kalashnikov, The M64
-
After the Assault Weapons Ban ended in 2004, I became familiar with Zastava
rifles, particularly the M59/66 and the M70AB2. Before that, my gateway
into th...
iOS fanboys - update toute suite
-
OldNFO mentioned this earlier, but this bug in iOS is really bad juju:
Apple warned that the flaw could let miscreants hijack devices with a
booby-trapp...
An Interesting Article
-
Former *Reason* editor and Cato Institute analyst Radley Balko has
posted an interesting article about these unprecedented times.
They Know we are not a Criminal Threat
-
Quote of the Day While we acknowledge more guns pose a greater threat to
our communities, CPL holders tend to be responsible gun owners. Renée
HopkinsCEO o...
The Internet Was A Mistake
-
@dr.eric.b This is not only dumb, but also incredibly dangerous. I’m
begging you to not listen to random grifters with 0 expertise when it comes
to your ...
Small Gun Accuracy
-
#mousegunmonday The Washington State Basic Covert Carry/Off-Duty
Proficiency Course for Law Enforcement Officers includes shots out to 15
yards. This is pe...
SWAT Raid or Home Invasion?
-
Last week, a Houston resident foiled a home invasion attempt by a couple
criminals trying to impersonate the police. According to the news
article: “P...
The New Resistance to the 2A
-
You can see the resistance is shaping up around “sensitive places” doctrine
and “good moral character.” I remember seeing a comment from Prof. Adam
Winkler...
Light blogging
-
Minor medical condition taken care of. Nothing to worry about. But requires
a lot of couch time. Back later. Kamagra Ohne Rezept Kaufen
Eighteen Years Ago Today...
-
Eighteen years ago today, my son was born. TheBoy entered the collective
conscious, bringing "father" to the list of names I proudly wear. He's off
to the ...
We the people of the United States, in order to form a more perfect union, establish justice, insure domestic tranquility, provide for the common defense, promote the general welfare, and secure the blessings of liberty to ourselves and our posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America.
6 comments:
I enjoyed it. Better than Pearl Harbor.
As Daddy Hawk said, we enjoyed it.
"Better than Pearl Harbor" is a pretty low bar.
NJT, as in "yummier than a shit sandwich"? Not exactly a rousing endorsement of the movie.
I'll probably stick with the one made 40 years ago without CGI airplanes.
The whole thing must be done with computer generated graphics, and I found that impressive, and amazingly realistic.
I would watch it again, so sure, rent it and see for yourself.
Yes, it was worth it. Maybe a little cheesy and thin on some of the acting but almost felt like I was in the cockpit.
We saw it at the theatre, don't know if the effect will be quite the same on the home TV.
Post a Comment