Well, THIS is nice.
"Appeals court decision casts doubt on Maryland’s assault weapons ban"
It's nice to see a disappointed Frosh, too. We hate that guy.
The ruling doesn't speak to carry outside the home, but the law agin 11 round magazine and AR15s that weren't Heavy Barrel varieties does implicate Heller stuffs directly.
You want to stop a home invader in Maryland, yesterday, you gotta use an AR that shoots .308, not .223.
Yeah it doesn't make sense to me either.
Still gotta wait for legal wrangling to, er... wrangle out.
Dissent says:
Judge Robert B. King wrote: “Let’s be real: The assault weapons banned by Maryland’s [law] are exceptionally lethal weapons of war” and as such, he said, not constitutionally protected.
Hmph. AR10 is, again, okey dokey.
And Their Point is?
-
Via Giffords and Robb Allen: I have to wonder what their point is. What do
they think or are trying to imply about the consequences of a state having
a goo...
7 hours ago
1 comment:
“Let’s be real: The assault weapons banned by Maryland’s [law] are exceptionally lethal weapons of war”
Seems expressly like what the 2nd Amendment was written to protect.
Post a Comment