Tuesday, July 17, 2012

Book Review 2

Fascinating book, the Man Eaters of Kumaon

I was already aware of Jim Corbett's theory about man-eating cats.  That the big predators normally eschew human prey unless injury or illness impacts their effectiveness at acquiring their normal quarry and take to the easier to catch human meat.  But in this book he reinforces that with examples.  That's fascinating of course, but more so is the hints of the extent of Corbett's woodcraft.

It's hard to convey competence afield through the written word.  Even in person little important habits and cues would be missed.  More so in that you can really only be stealthy alone.  So even a witness, there with him at the time, wouldn't get the full effect.

Time and again the hunter is stopped by instinct.  Like he could FEEL the Tiger's eyes on him without ever seeing of hearing it.  And this gut instinct, this 6th sense, kept him alive.  There are many quite close calls.  Tigers that eat people are very dangerous.  The whole book reminds me of the velociraptor scenes in the Jurassic Park movies, with the big game hunters.  Except these are actual creatures, rather than CGI, and creatures that had killed hundreds in just as gruesome a manner as in the movies, and thus were much more frightening.

One section that particularly conveys well is a section where he's tracking a cat on game trails.  Of course footprints or 'pug marks' are something I, and you, grok.  Tigers also sharpen their claws like a housecat.  I'd expect a 15 foot tall outsized upholstered sofa would last barely a week in the jungles of India.  Of course, there is no furniture there back then, but tigers made do with tree branches, logs and the like.  From the signs of such activity, Jim Corbette could tell:
  1. whether the cat was male of female
  2. the direction of travel
  3. how long since the scratches were made
  4. the direction and distance to its 'Headquarters'
  5. the nature of its kills
  6. whether the animal had eaten human flesh
I don't doubt his claims, but I only half know how he might gather such information and have an inkling on maybe one or two other details.  For instance, direction of travel, #2.  Corbett would know the wind direction and prevailing winds and where the sun was rising and setting.  From this he'd have a general idea on possible directions from knowledge of tiger habit.  A tiger uses its nose, too, to hunt and wind direction is important.  And a tiger knows the prey can smell, so it has another reason to travel with the breeze in its face.  One or two pug marks would also, naturally, give direction of travel.  Number 2 is relatively easy.  Number 4 you'd need long experience with tiger habits.  But #6?  I have no idea. 

7 comments:

John said...

The scratch marks he means ("for the same purpose as similar marks made by domestic cats") are made where tigers relieve themselves. Apparently cats tend to cover their droppings more or less thoroughly according to how near they are to the edges of their territories. The excrement itself might contain teeth or hair ( like long dark, i.e. human, hair ). How males and females differ in their scratch marks beats me, but Corbett proved himself many times over. You really should read The Man-Eating Leopard of Rudraprayag.

Old NFO said...

Yeah, #6 got me too...

zdogk9 said...

You need to read, "The Tiger; a True Story of Vengeance and Survival" by John Vaillant. the book gives a frightening insight into what a tiger is capable of when truly pissed off.
This took place in Siberia in the 1990s

zdogk9 said...

You need to read, "The Tiger; a True Story of Vengeance and Survival" by John Vaillant. the book gives a frightening insight into what a tiger is capable of when truly pissed off.
This took place in Siberia in the 1990s

mikelaforge said...

#6. Scat.

mikelaforge said...

Sorry, John, did not see you had already covered the cat scat angle.

John said...

A difficulty with Corbett's writing in his first book is that he believed he was writing only for his fellow residents of India and that he was born when Victoria was queen. He was indirect and understated to a degree that can be infuriating. For instance, his "very thrilling encounter with a leopard" which he only mentions because it caused him to get a late start on his journey home. (No, damn it, Corbett, go back and tell me about that leopard!) Also, he NEVER told the story about his "beyond the bounds of nature" experience in the bungalow.