I read an interesting story about dueling with Me-109's in the ETO, or possibly the Med. The technique was to initiate a climbing righthand turn when one got on your tail. IIRC, they had more trouble turning right, due to engine torque, and the stabilizer/rudder angle set to help correct for this. (Didn't matter which direction you turned the P-38, with the counter-rotating engines)
Keep it tight enough, and they couldn't get enough lead to hit you. Keep the climb steep, and eventually the German would stall and fall off. Close the inside(?) throttle, and the plane would rotate around the pilot while coming to a stop. Advance the closed throttle when you have rotated 180*, and you will be heading downhill at your enemy while he is still trying to get his plane to fly again. Pretty much a guaranteed kill, unless you really screw it up.
Seems to be a hammerhead turn, that doesn't require you to be vertical, since it is controlled by off-axis thrust, instead of gravity. Which means you don't have to wait for the aircraft to stop moving before it can rotate.
No idea how widespread this technique was. I suspect only a good, experienced p-38 pilot would attempt it, and combat conditions would be important, since you end up moving very slow toward the end of the climb. Makes you vulnerable to another fighter who still has energy or altitude over you. Still, a valid tool for your bag of tricks.
This was written in a P-38 flight test maybe 20 years ago. The pilot's father was the wartime pilot, and the son got seat time in a restored Lightning, and tried it. Said it worked fine, that handling and control was excellent.
Unfortunately, the son died later in a P-38 crash, when he botched the fuel tank selector switching during a landing pattern. Apparently, it's badly designed, and has killed a fair number of pilots. No idea why the US never moved to the British fuel tank feed system. NIH Syndrome, I guess. Jeffrey Ethell, was the name, I think. Good aircraft writer.
To be confident and competent enough with a rifle to be able to hit anything I can see in a Jovian Thunderbolt kind of way.
To be able to defend myself with a handgun.
To perhaps harvest some tasty venison with either a rifle or a shotgun, any skin or antler is just a nice bonus, here.
And, if necessary: To Defend the Ramparts of Democracy from a Level 4 Zombie Outbreak or against the Jacobin, Rampaging, Godless, Red-Commie Hordes (or their modern equivalent.)
"You never select a shotgun as your primary anti-zombie firearm. It's great for onesy twosey, but zombies travel in hordes. The reload time is onerous, and the ammo, while effective, is heavy and bulky and short ranged."
Big Mistake for Her
If Ginsberg had let Scalia put the words "strict scrutiny" in Heller and Hillary said "Gun control is just not going to be a priority for my administration," Hillary would have been elected President.
People I Hit F5 on all day, hoping for more content...
Port of Baltimore has limited reopening
-
Lots and lots of restrictions, but ships 60,000 tons or less and 30' draft
will be able to pass through a new restricted channel into and out of the
harb...
Women Need to Arm and Defend Themselves
-
Quote of The Day While many say that it’s more dangerous for a woman to arm
herself, the reality is that women are less likely to defend themselves in
the ...
Automat Soup
-
Last night, after wrestling with the dryer for a lot longer than I
realized,* I found myself hungry and with limited time and resources to do
anything...
My mind has been changed... mostly.
-
At the TacCon presenter's dinner this year, Andy Stanford passed out
SureFire Stilettos to attendees as door prizes.
When the Stiletto was introduced, it w...
2024 Rangemaster Roundup
-
Two weeks ago, I spent three days teaching and learning at the Rangemaster
Tactical Training Conference in Dallas. I’ve now taught at the last 11
Tactical...
Tactical Conference 2025
-
Some folks have said they go to the Tactical Conference because it sells
out so quickly. Here’s the scoop for next year. They’ll go quick so don’t
delay.
What is the Best Maxim Gun? (with John Keene)
-
Today, Ian is talking to John Keene, NFA specialist for Morphy Auctions.
The question is, what is the best model of Maxim gun? Whether it’s for a
recreat...
The New Resistance to the 2A
-
You can see the resistance is shaping up around “sensitive places” doctrine
and “good moral character.” I remember seeing a comment from Prof. Adam
Winkler...
For A Friend...
-
Folks, I'm breaking my over-a-year-long streak of not posting because I
have some sad news. Someone that I consider a good friend, Chance over at
SayUncle,...
We the people of the United States, in order to form a more perfect union, establish justice, insure domestic tranquility, provide for the common defense, promote the general welfare, and secure the blessings of liberty to ourselves and our posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America.
1 comment:
I read an interesting story about dueling with Me-109's in the ETO, or possibly the Med. The technique was to initiate a climbing righthand turn when one got on your tail. IIRC, they had more trouble turning right, due to engine torque, and the stabilizer/rudder angle set to help correct for this. (Didn't matter which direction you turned the P-38, with the counter-rotating engines)
Keep it tight enough, and they couldn't get enough lead to hit you. Keep the climb steep, and eventually the German would stall and fall off. Close the inside(?) throttle, and the plane would rotate around the pilot while coming to a stop. Advance the closed throttle when you have rotated 180*, and you will be heading downhill at your enemy while he is still trying to get his plane to fly again. Pretty much a guaranteed kill, unless you really screw it up.
Seems to be a hammerhead turn, that doesn't require you to be vertical, since it is controlled by off-axis thrust, instead of gravity. Which means you don't have to wait for the aircraft to stop moving before it can rotate.
No idea how widespread this technique was. I suspect only a good, experienced p-38 pilot would attempt it, and combat conditions would be important, since you end up moving very slow toward the end of the climb. Makes you vulnerable to another fighter who still has energy or altitude over you. Still, a valid tool for your bag of tricks.
This was written in a P-38 flight test maybe 20 years ago. The pilot's father was the wartime pilot, and the son got seat time in a restored Lightning, and tried it. Said it worked fine, that handling and control was excellent.
Unfortunately, the son died later in a P-38 crash, when he botched the fuel tank selector switching during a landing pattern. Apparently, it's badly designed, and has killed a fair number of pilots. No idea why the US never moved to the British fuel tank feed system. NIH Syndrome, I guess. Jeffrey Ethell, was the name, I think. Good aircraft writer.
Post a Comment