So, in the civil war, the 'mag' capacity of a rifle was one and more American soldiers were kill than all our other wars put together.
In WWI the capacity was from 5 bullets on a stripper clip. 6 total in the bandoleer. Horrible war. Look at the casualty list for the Somme. But the US didn't lose so many in that war, but only because we were a bit late to the party.
In WWII and Korea the US infantry used a rifle with an 8 round capacity. A few hundred thousand deaths,
Viet Nam, 20 round mags, 50,000 deaths.
War on Terror, 30 round mags, a coupla thousand deaths...
See the more rounds in a rifle, the less soldiers get kilt.
So, if we issue 100 round mags in the next war we might not lose a man in battle. I wonder why that is? It's not that they are overwhelming the enemy with capacity, as in each case the 'other side' has comparables.
The War on Terror is not aimed at terror - It's aimed at Democracy: At least 24 climate activists have been put under house arrest by French police, accused of flouting a ban on organising protests ...
1 hour ago