If someone told me to go out and buy a riflescope I'd go shopping at Leupold first thing. They are fine scopes and some are even priced such that you won't swallow your gum when you see it.
But they mostly seem to be variable magnification. I'm kinda thinking something simpler in 6X or less and fixed is more my style.
Like these.
Why am I stupid for wanting that and need to be talked down off that ledge? Or am I sorta heading in the right direction? 4x or 6x?
People I Hit F5 on all day, hoping for more content...
-
-
TFB Review: DNT Optics TheOne 7-35x56 MRAD Scope - DNT Optics is a new player in the optics space. Most of their lineup focuses on night vision and thermal optics, but they also have a new traditional rifle...3 hours ago
-
Gaetz Goes - Matt Gaetz withdrew Thursday as President-elect Donald Trump’s pick for attorney general amid continued fallout over a federal sex trafficking investigat...8 hours ago
-
The Bad Guys are on a losing streak - Earlier this week we saw a bunch of Russian hackers sentenced to prison, now we see Interpol execute a massive take down of multiple groups of Bad Guys: ...13 hours ago
-
Already WWIII? - Quote of the Day Joe Biden‘s administration has allowed Volodymyr Zelensky to launch American-made missiles into Russia, with allies of both Donald Trump a...14 hours ago
-
-
All Right, That's Enough - Most people agree that Washington, D.C. is a semi-evil clown circus, or at least the parts that the fed.gov lurks in are. They start to disagree when...14 hours ago
-
Should You Change Your Defensive Ammunition During Colder Weather? - Written by: Greg Ellifritz I occasionally get questions from readers about changing their defensive ammo to better defeat heavier winter clothing in the ...16 hours ago
-
P99: The Pistol that Rejuvenated Walther - For a couple decades after World War Two, Walther survived on legacy designs – the PP/PPK and P38 (eventually made with an aluminum frame as the P4) prim...1 day ago
-
Situational Awareness and Positioning (part VI) - Greg Ellifritz included an article I wrote ten years ago in this week’s edition of his Weekend Knowledge Dump. https://www.activeresponsetraining.net/weeke...6 days ago
-
-
Another update - Apparently, comments now must be approved. That has been done. Sorry about all that.1 year ago
-
-
The New Resistance to the 2A - You can see the resistance is shaping up around “sensitive places” doctrine and “good moral character.” I remember seeing a comment from Prof. Adam Winkler...2 years ago
-
For A Friend... - Folks, I'm breaking my over-a-year-long streak of not posting because I have some sad news. Someone that I consider a good friend, Chance over at SayUncle,...4 years ago
-
About Me
4 comments:
I'm with you. I love a good fixed 4x.
A good fixed power is a great scope. It depends on what you will be using the scope for, if 6x is the right choice. If a target appears very close, it is easy to get "lost in magnification" on a higher power scope. If you are hunting, I'd go for a variable, or a 4x scope. If this will be a range gun- the 6x will be great.
Also look at the offerings from Redfield- Made by Leupold in the US. I have a couple of them, and they compare great against my Leupolds: http://www.redfield.com
Nothing wrong with those scopes for an M14 variant. Whether they are best for your needs is a different question. I suspect almost any of them would serve you well.
I also tend to prefer fixed power scopes in general -- you get more (better optics, more rugged, or both) for less money when it's fixed. Not to say that variable scopes are bad - they've come a LONG way in just my shooting lifetime - but a variable is inherently more complex and has more to go wrong, so to get the same optical performance and ruggedness, you're gonna pay a significant bit more.
Now, if I was scoping a "0-400m" carbine, I'd likely look at a variable 1-4x or so, and if I was scoping an honest-to-God sniper rifle, I'd consider a variable -- but in both cases, I'd be at least as likely to end up with a fixed power scope. Of course, I tend to favor mildot* scopes for ranging and adjustment purposes, and I loathe the idea of forgetting to dial the scope to the magnification the reticle is calibrated for. . . which means in a variable, I am almost always looking at a First Focal Plane scope or nothing.
* (I don;t care for ballistic compensating reticles or range drums, because they assume you are shooting a particular load at a particular velocity -- if your favored load is different or you have a different barrel length, it will be off by some amount, great or small. I'd rather have a range card taped to my buttstock to tell me how many dots to hold. But I know how to range with mils, and since my brain processes shooting in "meters" rather than "feet", mils are more natural for me than MOA, even if MOA is a finer grain.)
Agree with both That Guy and Geodk.. Depends on the use...
Post a Comment