Critical?

"Court agrees to hear CRITICAL gun case."

Explain to me how this is critical. 

I've already gone over it.  There is an unlikely event that the court might make an expansive ruling.  "You may move your gun around NYC to places other than the 7 gun ranges on the list..." is the expected good ruling.  For expansive the court has to go... "And, in fact, you can carry it around just about anywhere, loaded, in your holster, all across the country.  That's what 'bear' means."  And I don't see, from here, how it get's there with that case. 

I think it's just wishcasting to even half expect this rosier outcome.  "Don't expect miracles," says Gun-Blog Eeyore, and this time I share his pessimism as realistic and not just Negative Waves.  Most likely, they don't even touch scrutiny.  And then, if this is the scrutiny case, I think it's a tossup.  50/50.  I hope for strict scrutiny, but can't connect the dots to get there, now. 

So, why this headline, Fox?  And NSSF for that matter.  Critical?  Illogical.  Please explain.