There is a bone of Contention amongst those who study the Constitution, and that would be the 9th and 10th Amendments. Some (the Hippie /Commie/Progressive Crowd) say that means "just because it ain't written down, doesn't mean I don't have the Right to (fill in the blank) whenever I feel like it, and you can't stop me!" Others ( the Conservitive, Practical, Grounded in Reality Crowd) say that they Founders never meant to imply that Anarchy can Reign Supreme, as there are limits.
But no matter what side you are, there are Rights that are written down, and the Commies better get get used to the Fact that they have no right to try to remove them, such as the RKBA. Or THEY should start to face the Consequences of their actions. If the Chaos in the Middle East should teach ANYONE in Power in the West, is that they are just as vulnerable to removal as any Middle Eastern Thug Dictator, no matter how long they've been in Charge.
To be confident and competent enough with a rifle to be able to hit anything I can see in a Jovian Thunderbolt kind of way.
To be able to defend myself with a handgun.
To perhaps harvest some tasty venison with either a rifle or a shotgun, any skin or antler is just a nice bonus, here.
And, if necessary: To Defend the Ramparts of Democracy from a Level 4 Zombie Outbreak or against the Jacobin, Rampaging, Godless, Red-Commie Hordes (or their modern equivalent.)
"You never select a shotgun as your primary anti-zombie firearm. It's great for onesy twosey, but zombies travel in hordes. The reload time is onerous, and the ammo, while effective, is heavy and bulky and short ranged."
Big Mistake for Her
If Ginsberg had let Scalia put the words "strict scrutiny" in Heller and Hillary said "Gun control is just not going to be a priority for my administration," Hillary would have been elected President.
People I Hit F5 on all day, hoping for more content...
Swedish Kulspruta m/36 Double Browning MGs
-
Despite being a neutral power during World War Two, Sweden had a variety of
very interesting small arms – like their dual-mount Browning m/36 machine
gun...
Florida Hockey: 4-2 in last 6 Stanley Cups
-
Congratulations to the Florida Panthers - and particularly to Panther
Center Sam Reinhart who tied a Stanley Cup record with *four* goals last
night. Th...
How Not To Get Published
-
Unlike many blogs, this one has a comments section -- but it's not
automatic. I screen comments.
From time to time, one of my perennially-unpubl...
Never a Free Market or a Free Mind
-
Quote of the Day “We are entering moments that we have never experienced
before,” Rep. Summer Lee, D-Pa., told constituents at a town hall in
Pittsburgh la...
Weekend Knowledge Dump- June 13, 2025
-
Knowledge to make your life better. If you have some free time, check out
some of these links this weekend. The world is getting a bit spicy
again. Doze...
The New Resistance to the 2A
-
You can see the resistance is shaping up around “sensitive places” doctrine
and “good moral character.” I remember seeing a comment from Prof. Adam
Winkler...
Light blogging
-
Minor medical condition taken care of. Nothing to worry about. But requires
a lot of couch time. Back later. Kamagra Ohne Rezept Kaufen
Eighteen Years Ago Today...
-
Eighteen years ago today, my son was born. TheBoy entered the collective
conscious, bringing "father" to the list of names I proudly wear. He's off
to the ...
We the people of the United States, in order to form a more perfect union, establish justice, insure domestic tranquility, provide for the common defense, promote the general welfare, and secure the blessings of liberty to ourselves and our posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America.
2 comments:
Um... not so much... A desire maybe, but not a right...
There is a bone of Contention amongst those who study the Constitution, and that would be the 9th and 10th Amendments. Some (the Hippie /Commie/Progressive Crowd) say that means "just because it ain't written down, doesn't mean I don't have the Right to (fill in the blank) whenever I feel like it, and you can't stop me!" Others ( the Conservitive, Practical, Grounded in Reality Crowd) say that they Founders never meant to imply that Anarchy can Reign Supreme, as there are limits.
But no matter what side you are, there are Rights that are written down, and the Commies better get get used to the Fact that they have no right to try to remove them, such as the RKBA. Or THEY should start to face the Consequences of their actions. If the Chaos in the Middle East should teach ANYONE in Power in the West, is that they are just as vulnerable to removal as any Middle Eastern Thug Dictator, no matter how long they've been in Charge.
Post a Comment