Sunday, December 6, 2015

I was thinking...

And that can be dangerous.

If Obama was exactly the same as he is now, but had Sarah Palin's view on guns, I'd still dislike him, (just awful) but I'd have bought no AR15s.

Thanks Obama.

I'd have probably been lulled into a false sense of security by now.  And would not be inflicting this blog upon you.


So which candidate is acceptible for 2016?  Jeb is not, as he'd make anyone on a secret gov't list a prohibited person.  Idjit.  You need to get rid of the list, Jeb, not use it more.

No Bush is acceptable.  Papa or W were both wretched on guns.  Papa more than W, but W would have signed an Assault Weapon's ban.

Cruz and Rand and definitely acceptable.  Carson was anti-gun 2 years ago.  Trump the same.  Dunno bout Fiorina.  Fine, now, I am sure.  She is better than W, I bet, but I don't know.

So, Cruz/Fiorina ticket in 2016?



DoninSacto1 said...

Works for me.

New Jovian Thunderbolt said...

forgot about Rubio. But he is forgettable.

Angus McThag said...

Before you dismiss someone for being anti-gun in the past.

Lots of us gunnies used to be too!

Weer'd Beerd for example. I was a hard core "only gov't needs guns" until I joined the Army. We used to be anti-gun, but we got better. Plus, relapsing to the anti-gun state seems very very rare.

Mike W. said...

Cruz / Rubio / Rand / Fiorina seem like the only semi-sane, intelligent folks of the whole lot, and only the 1st two have even a shot in hell at the nomination.